Thursday, April 17, 2008

OMG! That Was So Cool!--Sea Monsters in 3D

Sea Monsters promotional image      My wife's six year old nephew and his family have been in town this week, so we've been looking for interesting entertainment options for them in the Triangle. Today we decided to take in Sea Monsters: a Prehistoric Adventure in 3D at the IMAX theater in Raleigh. The last time I saw a 3D movie was about twenty-five years ago, trying to balance on my nose a pair of those cardboard red/blue glasses that they used to use to create the 3D effects. That was also a sea monster movie--Jaws 3--and it was wretched, wretched.
      Well 3D has come a long way, baby. Obviously aimed at a young audience, and despite a few moments of dubious theorizing and over-dramatization a la the Discovery Channel, "Sea Monsters in 3D" was nevertheless enthralling from beginning to end. Mostly computer animated with a few live-action scenes of actors playing paleontologists and amateur fossil hunters, "Sea Monsters" dramatizes the lives of a few of the sexier species of prehistoric marine life. The visual effects are truly impressive, to the point that objects seem to actually pass behind you as they cross your field of vision. The theater was filled with school groups, and every menacing approach of a toothy leviathan elicited delighted screams of terror from the crowd. They would also wave their hands in the air in a futile attempt to grab the floating objects that did in fact seem within the viewers' grasp.
      I'm not sure who enjoyed it more--my nephew or me.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Sound and Fury--Polanski's Macbeth (1971) DVD

Polanski's Macbeth film poster      I had never before seen Roman Polanski's Macbeth, but a film group discussion and the presence of Jon Finch in the lead prompted me to get it from Netflix. A quick glance around the internet turns up reviews that make much of the fact that this is the first film Polanski made after the Manson murders and his wife's death. I'm generally leery of biographical criticism, preferring to let the "text" speak for itself, but there's no denying that Polanski's Macbeth is by far the bleakest version I've ever seen (and I've seen "Throne of Blood"!).
      At first, I liked it. The cinematography is dark and claustrophobic; the sun is almost never seen. When it is, it appears as a faint, distant stain behind the clouds, or as a bit of blue sky, but always outside the dark gates of Macbeth's keep. I've always liked Jon Finch in Shakespeare (he did two really great Henry IV's for the BBC), and he's very good again here. Polanski's Lady Macbeth (Francesca Annis), however, is a disappointing nonentity--she says all of her important lines, but this Macbeth needs little convincing, and she comes off as being weaker than he, which doesn't jibe with my reading of the play at all. If Macbeth is pure ambition from the beginning, then there's no tragedy.
      There's no doubt that this is the production of a talented filmmaker with the skill to transfer his vision to the screen. But Polanski's apparent vision of Macbeth reminds me of some of the complaints about the nihilism of "No Country For Old Men." MacDuff doesn't so much save Scotland as simply put a broken man out of his misery. When a filmmaker actually agrees with Macbeth that life is "a tale told by an idiot/full of sound and fury, signifying nothing," one can't help but wonder, "so why bother?"